Started By
Message

re: Amendment 40 Red Snapper Discussion

Posted on 8/28/14 at 9:29 pm to
Posted by Sparkplug#1
Member since May 2013
7352 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 9:29 pm to
You're a retard. Being both a commercial snapper fisherman (long ago) and a rec snapper fisherman today, I totally see both sides, but when it comes down to it, I'd give it to the commercial guys that have been doing it for generations. Don't take a man's livelihood in exchange for your pleasure.
This post was edited on 8/28/14 at 9:30 pm
Posted by Sparkplug#1
Member since May 2013
7352 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 9:35 pm to
That being said, there are plenty snapper for all.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81969 posts
Posted on 8/29/14 at 8:28 am to
quote:

but when it comes down to it, I'd give it to the commercial guys that have been doing it for generations. Don't take a man's livelihood in exchange for your pleasure.

Wait....what? This pleasure you speak of is still the pursuit of the same food. These people just don't need to hire someone to get it done.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57530 posts
Posted on 8/29/14 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

I'd give it to the commercial guys that have been doing it for generations. Don't take a man's livelihood in exchange for your pleasure.
you kidding bro? IMO if a species of fish is in trouble, the FIRST sector to be cut out is the Commercial side. There are plenty of other fish they can move onto to make a living. Just my opinion i bet most dont agree.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram