your point is so stupid it can't be refuted.

Your point: If there were ever intelligence failures then it's ok we went to war in Iraq for no good reason.

Or

If there were ever intelligence failures then there could've been WMDs in Iraq.

THERE WERE NO WMD'S. It's like living in a fact-free zone.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by DawgfaninCa

San Francisco, California

Member since Sep 2012

20092 posts

Posted on 8/22/14 at 1:40 pm to Tigah in the ATL

quote:
your point is so stupid it can't be refuted.

Maybe you're just so stupid you can't refute it.

quote:
Your point: If there were ever intelligence failures then it's ok we went to war in Iraq for no good reason.

Nope. That's not the point that I was making.

quote:
If there were ever intelligence failures then there could've been WMDs in Iraq.

THERE WERE NO WMD'S. It's like living in a fact-free zone.

Nope, that's not the point I was making.

Here's a hint.

Reread my posts in this thread.

Geez, it's like living in the Twilight Zone.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Ace Midnight

Between sanity and madness

Member since Dec 2006

89790 posts

Posted on 8/22/14 at 8:46 pm to Tigah in the ATL

quote:
THERE WERE NO WMD'S

Of course there were. One of the silliest propoganda lies in history, because now even people like Bush and Powell say it.

There were loads and loads of WMDs in Iraq at the time of the invasion - there had been for decades.

The nuclear program was broken, but it existed. Part of the problem is that they were too scared to give Saddam real reports about it, so they lied to him. Even Saddam thought he had a more robust nuke program than he had.

But, go ahead - keep spinning and spinning the lie - so that we never get to really talk about what really happened.

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board