Started By
Message

re: Dawkins: "immoral to bring [Down's Syndrome baby] into the world"

Posted on 8/21/14 at 10:43 am to
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 10:43 am to
quote:


We are going back to eugenics. It's happening.
aborting downs syndrome fetuses isn't really eugenics as people with downs syndrome have a very low chance of producing viable offspring anyway

I'm not saying it's right to abort them but calling it eugenics if they are aborted is incorrect.
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 10:46 am to
quote:

aborting downs syndrome fetuses isn't really eugenics



It's the fricking definition of eugenics. If there was a "gay gene" and people could abort those children, it would still be eugenics, and it would still be evil.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram