re: "Mike Brown Law. Requires all state, county, and local police to wear a camera."

quote:

---

The defense will attack the victim.

---

Not sure they will attack the victim, but seeing who the victim is does play a part. If you do not believe that, then you have not been paying attention. The family and media wants to show a much younger and docile looking image and was outraged at the crime footage shown, because that image of Brown helps their narrative.

quote:

---

Not really. As more info comes out, it appears we know less and less.

---

The autopsy report showed us that he was not shot in the back. No?

quote:

---

dehumanize the victim. That's a good defense, too.

---

He was a huge man, a very large man whose size and the previous struggle for the cop's weapon justifies any fear the officer may have had for his own safety and life.

quote:

---

There's no evidence he was running towards the cop when he was shot.

---

Did you see the press conference this morning? There is much evidence to support the argument that he was facing the cop. No shots in the back. I am sure if there were bullet holes in the back you would see that as evidence.

I would bet you, that had there been bullet holes in his back, many people that were supporting the cop, would have changed their tunes and said the cop was dirty and needed to be charged. You on the other hand, cannot see any situation where you would think that the black guy put the cop's life in danger which would justify the shoot.

You are dishonest and have no interest in the truth in this matter.