Started By
Message

re: Charges against Perry should wait until he is out of office - agree/disagree?

Posted on 8/18/14 at 10:17 am to
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36129 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 10:17 am to
quote:

I read the statute yesterday, and although I'm not a fan of Rick Perry's I think this indictment is pure baloney that does not comport with the intent or spirit of that law.

The obvious purpose of that law is to keep officials from being coerced into performing something foreign to the public interest, or to keep officials from being coerced into neglecting something that would be in the public interest.

Coercing a person to perform or refrain from a particular duty is not the same as coercing her to step down... after which there is NO particular action to perform or neglect. The latter type of coercion is not meant to provoke a particular discharge or mischarge of a public duty, and is not the type of coercion addressed in the statute.

Perry seems to be well within his gubernatorial rights to withhold funding by veto power from an agency he thinks suffers from poor leadership.




Rex - the DWI is just a cover for the real reason. The real reason Perry wanted her to step down is the Public Integrity Unit is one of the only political bodies with statewide power in Texas with a Democrat in charge. They were investigating Perry's pet project - CPRIT - for making grants to Perry's buddies without following protocol - and Perry wanted that to stop.

Come on dude - you didn't seriously think this was just about a crazy drunken lady, right?

LINK /
This post was edited on 8/18/14 at 10:18 am
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Rex - the DWI is just a cover for the real reason. The real reason Perry wanted her to step down is the Public Integrity Unit is one of the only political bodies with statewide power in Texas with a Democrat in charge. They were investigating Perry's pet project - CPRIT - for making grants to Perry's buddies without following protocol - and Perry wanted that to stop.

I'm sure he DID want it to stop, but that doesn't change anything I posted. It's too bad the DA gave him a valid reason for stopping her. I, too, question the leadership qualifications of a DA who would drive while very intoxicated.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27843 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 10:29 am to
quote:

SpidermanTUba


great link:

quote:

In 2005, the work of the Public Integrity Unit led to the indictment of former U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay.


Fails to mention he was acquitted. Incompetence for a while it seems.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram