Started By
Message

re: No more K & DEF, should I replace them with another position?

Posted on 8/6/14 at 4:34 pm to
Posted by PurpleDrank18
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2011
4508 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 4:34 pm to
I can understand getting rid of the K. That's the most random and useless position in FF. There is no telling how one will do, no real stats, no matchup preferences, etc.

As far as D goes, I think its a good FF roster spot. If you can find that "sleeper" D (KC in 2013, CIN 2013, SEA 2012) it can really pay dividends.
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
51875 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

KC in 2013, CIN 2013


add Carolina to that
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
51012 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 4:42 pm to
I can understand the reasoning for keeping DEF. Fair argument. It just seems like huge random weeks happen with a bunch of TDs or turnovers. Minimizing their points was something I considered as well.
Posted by Gtothemoney
Da North Shore
Member since Sep 2012
17715 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

I can understand getting rid of the K. That's the most random and useless position in FF. There is no telling how one will do, no real stats, no matchup preferences, etc


I get this, but you know how many times whether I win or lose comes down to a made or miss FG on Monday night? And watching whether the offense reaches a certain yard line to depend how many points the kick is.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram