Started By
Message

re: IRS made deal to scrutinize churches

Posted on 8/1/14 at 6:29 am to
Posted by ironsides
Nashville, TN
Member since May 2006
8153 posts
Posted on 8/1/14 at 6:29 am to
quote:

the way black churches blatantly flaunt electioneering restrictions, that conservatives would favor this.


Reading between the lines you are acknowledging that black churches are more politically active and this, if applied equally, assuming no scandals and not a smidgeon of corruption, would hurt them more because you are defending it.

This is about free speech and freedom to practice whatever religion you want. It's one of the founding principals this country was founded on. If you can't see the dangers, and if you see all of this as progress you cannot be helped.

DOJ and black churches. Whites not afforded same treatment
This post was edited on 8/1/14 at 6:33 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99709 posts
Posted on 8/1/14 at 6:35 am to
Sounds like the "sue and settle" bullshite the greens do with the EPA.
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 8/1/14 at 7:07 am to
quote:

Reading between the lines you are acknowledging that black churches are more politically active and this, if applied equally, assuming no scandals and not a smidgeon of corruption, would hurt them more because you are defending it.

I'm not acknowledging black churches are more politically active. I'm acknowledging complaints I've seen on this board re this...which is why I said one would think conservatives would favor this.

And your link and title don't add up. Churches, white or black, can seek advice as to how far they can go without breaking the law. There's no conspiracy here.

As for "the dangers", it's the law and has been the law. Nothing has changed except the IRS has agreed to move toward enforcing it.

Nothing stops a church or an organization from campaigning. The IRS cannot stop anyone from campaigning. But if you campaign for candidates when you applied for tax exempt status claiming you would not do so, it's a bit disingenuous to claim your rights are being violated.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram