- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would the Allies have won WWII without America getting involved?
Posted on 7/26/14 at 12:44 pm to Nativebullet
Posted on 7/26/14 at 12:44 pm to Nativebullet
As long as your hypothetical seniero includes America supplying the Soviets in the same manner as really happened, then yes, tha Allues would have won.
Take away American supplies, thd Soviets crumble and Germsny wins. Simply put, without American supplies the Red Arny would have been barefoot and starving and virtually devoid of any motor transport.
Take away American supplies, thd Soviets crumble and Germsny wins. Simply put, without American supplies the Red Arny would have been barefoot and starving and virtually devoid of any motor transport.
1
Posted on 7/26/14 at 12:48 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Take away American supplies, thd Soviets crumble and Germsny wins. Simply put, without American supplies the Red Arny would have been barefoot and starving and virtually devoid of any motor transport.
While I don't fully agree, there is a lot of support for this argument. We provided trucks and food, a whole host of things that helped keep the USSR in the fight before we ever formally entered the war - ditto for the U.K.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News