Started By
Message

re: A History of Tiger Stadium: Evolution of the Pantheon of Concrete and Steel

Posted on 7/25/14 at 12:47 pm to
Posted by Turkey_Creek_Tiger
Member since Dec 2012
12343 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 12:47 pm to
quote:




why did they not make the south endzone the same as the north endzone in 1953? It would have looked so much nicer
This post was edited on 7/25/14 at 12:48 pm
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
19754 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

why did they not make the south endzone the same as the north endzone in 1953? It would have looked so much nicer


Had it mirrored the North upper, the seats in the new South upperdeck would be worse and even further from the field. So I think it worked out well in the long run. And by the looks of the original, they could have gone back and continued the arches on the exterior.
Posted by Sev09
Nantucket
Member since Feb 2011
15584 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

why did they not make the south endzone the same as the north endzone in 1953? It would have looked so much nicer


Answered this earlier:

quote:

Twofold:

1.) DIdn't have the room on that side to mirror the north enclosure. Given the space constraints, they had to make the expansion double-decked instead of a single stadium slope.

2.) We needed seats fast, but we weren't yet a very wealthy athletic department, so we took a couple shortcuts with the design. Hello, ugly pillar design.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram