Yes, he needs a lot of refinement.

Still, if the doctrine of one party is to use IRS regulations in ways not intended by law then it stands to reason that they would and should receive greater scrutiny.

But, no, generally, groups should not be subjected to IRS disfavoritism simply because of party affiliation.

2 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by SlowFlowPro

Simple Solutions to Complex Probs

Member since Jan 2004

432264 posts

Posted on 7/23/14 at 9:01 am to Rex

quote:
if the doctrine of one party is to use IRS regulations in ways not intended by law then it stands to reason that they would and should receive greater scrutiny.

that's a broad stroke

all this funny business with the investigations at issue could easily be interpreted as a doctrine of the DEMs to "use IRS regulations in ways not intended by law", in a MUCH more direct way that what i presume you will claim to be the mis-use by the "conservative" group.

i agree with your statement, in a general sense, but i don't think i will agree with how that point links to conservative groups. so, to clarify, are you presuming the targeted groups were using IRS regs incorrectly?

0 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by Wolfhound45

Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan

Member since Nov 2009

120000 posts

Posted on 7/23/14 at 9:34 am to Rex

quote:
But, no, generally, groups should not be subjected to IRS disfavoritism simply because of party affiliation.

Equivocate much?

The correct answer is "No, groups should not.."

If Progressivism is such a morally superior system then it does not need the additional "help" from the IRS.

0 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board