Started By
Message

re: "Hated hated hated hated hated this movie." Ebert's review turns 20

Posted on 7/22/14 at 12:26 pm to
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25418 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

And the Rob Schneider thing was personal. Schneider received a bad review from another film critic, and attacked the writer in print on a personal level. So Ebert ripped Schneider's weak arse argument apart. It was beautiful. You can't make a personal attack on someone and then complain when they use your words to make you look like a petty a-hole.


I didn't know about this when it happened. I just read the review. The other critic had attacked Schneider on a personal level to start it off with by calling him a "third rate comic." I don't disagree with that, but it seemed to be pretty petty all the way around from all parties involved.

ETA: Schneider would have looked better if his come back wasn't moronic.
This post was edited on 7/22/14 at 12:29 pm
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

Dear Jay, What an ugly way to leave the Sun-Times. It does not speak well for you. Your timing was exquisite. You signed a new contract, waited until days after the newspaper had paid for your trip to Beijing at great cost, and then resigned with only an email. You saved your explanation for a local television station. As someone who was working here for 24 years before you arrived, I think you owed us more than that. You owed us decency. The fact that you saved your attack for TV only completes our portrait of you as a rat. Newspapers are not dead, Jay, although you predicted the death of the Sun-Times and the Tribune. Neither paper will die any time soon. Job-hunting tip: It is imprudent to go on TV and predict the collapse of a newspaper you might hope would hire you. Times are hard in the newspaper business, and for the economy as a whole. Did you only sign on for the luxury cruise? There's an old saying that you might have come across once or twice on the sports beat: "When the going gets tough, the tough get going." Newspapers are not dead, Jay, because there are still readers who want the whole story, not a sound bite. If you only work on television, viewers may get a little weary of you shouting at them. You were a great shouter in print, that's for sure, stomping your feet when owners, coaches, players and fans didn't agree with you. It was an entertaining show. Good luck getting one of your 1,000-word rants on the air. The rest of us are still at work, still putting out the best paper we can. We believe in our profession, and in the future. And we believe in our Internet site, which you also whacked as you slithered out the door. I don't know how your column was doing, but we have the most popular sports section in Chicago. The reports and blog entries by our Washington editor Lynn Sweet have become a must-stop for millions of Americans in this election year. After a recent blog entry I wrote about the Beijing Olympics, I woke up at 5 a.m. one morning, when North America was asleep, and found that 40 percent of my 100 most recent visitors had been from China. I don't have any complaints about our Web site. So far this month my Web page page has been visited from virtually every country on earth, including one visit from the Vatican City. The Pope, no doubt. Hope you were doing as well. You have left us, Jay, at a time when the newspaper is once again in the hands of people who love newspapers and love producing them. You managed to stay here through the dark days of the thieves Conrad Black and David Radler. The paper lost millions. Incredibly, we are still paying Black's legal fees. I started here when Marshall Field and Jim Hoge were running the paper. I stayed through the Rupert Murdoch regime. I was asked, "How can you work for a Murdoch paper?" My reply was: "It's not his paper. It's my paper. He only owns it." That's the way I've always felt about the Sun-Times, and I still do. On your way out, don't let the door bang you on the arse.


Jay Mariotti didn't owe ebert a god damn thing and he's free to pursue other opportunities (even if it was a bad choice) ebert who has a tv show throwing a tantrum because someone tried to move on and had a bone to pick with management.

Why even comment on this and then of course, attack his credentials as well. Ebert was a slimy little weasel
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram