Started By
Message

re: Are younger voters ripe to be converted to Libertarianism?

Posted on 7/18/14 at 2:15 pm to
Posted by rintintin
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
16227 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 2:15 pm to
I was laughing at his blanket statement condemning all young people as spoiled brats. While there surely are a litter of spoiled youth, I don't think it's as large a portion as one may think.

IMO young voters are more likely to vote democrat because of the lack of choices. I believe most have libertarian views, but the simple fact of only having 2 choices makes them choose the lesser of the evils in their eyes. This young generation doesn't relate to the old conservative view of strong religious beliefs, anti-gay, anti-drug, anti-abortion, pro-war (maybe pro-defense spending is a better term), etc. Young people relate to social issues much more than foreign policy, economic policy, taxation, etc, therefore they vote for what they know they believe in, and democrats hold the edge on those issues.

If a true Libertarian candidate had the limelight and was able to run on the same platform as democrats and republicans, I think they would receive a large portion of young votes.
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

IMO young voters are more likely to vote democrat because of the lack of choices. I believe most have libertarian views, but the simple fact of only having 2 choices makes them choose the lesser of the evils in their eyes.
The main issue seems to be bitter-arse conservatives continually asserting that younger voters disproportionately skewing Democratic "proves" they only care about social issues. The unstated premise being that if they cared about economic issues they would vote Republican.

Today's young voters mostly became politically aware during the Bush administration. What evidence do young voters have that Republican economic policies are anywhere close to libertarian that doesn't exist in history book--sorry, Wikipedia?

To say nothing of the third leg of politics which is never spoken of in these debates: foreign policy. Today's young voters also mostly came of age during the war on terror. The 2003 AUMF vote notwithstanding, young people remember who was more hawkish. They can also see now which side hasn't learned shite and is responding to every crisis with "WHY ISN'T OBAMA SENDING IN THE WEAPONS/STRIKES/TROOPS"

Libertarianism isn't solely maximalist opposition to the welfare state, unless you want to read out Hayek and Friedman. It's peace and liberty. One side is offering slightly better (although still pretty shitty) deals on two legs of the stool. The other, with the exception of Rand Paul and a few others, is offering exactly what it has since Nixon, but this time with Thomas Jefferson cosplay.
This post was edited on 7/18/14 at 2:23 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram