Started By
Message
locked post

A better story about Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Posted on 7/18/14 at 11:10 am
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62244 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 11:10 am

This is Tsutomu Yamaguchi. He was an engineer for Mitsibushi. He survived both atomic blasts, Hiroshima AND Nagasaki, though he suffered severe burns and ruptured eardrums, many people further than him from ground zero were killed.


After the war, he became a translator for US Marines.

He lived to be 93
Posted by tipup
Member since Sep 2005
1649 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 11:17 am to
That's a story I can read. 1 picture and 5 sentences! The End.
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 11:21 am to
I'm not sure how to feel about this.

I'm conflicted
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
154046 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 11:26 am to
20 years ago CNN did a report for the 50th anniversary of Pearl Harbor. I got ready to hear about the sneak attack.

Instead the entire report was about a guy who'd lived through the Hiroshima bombing and dedicated his life to telling the world what a terrible war crime it was. This was on December 7, yet.

They had it coming.



quote:

Ralph Anthony "Iggy" Ignatowski (April 8, 1926 – March 4–7, 1945) was a United States Marine Corps private who was captured and killed by the Japanese in the Battle of Iwo Jima during World War II. The circumstances of this personally involved one of the Iwo Jima flag raisers, John Bradley.
quote:

in the book Flags of Our Fathers, coauthored by the son of flag raiser John Bradley. The following are his recollections of Ignatowski's death:
quote:

"I have tried so hard to block this out. To forget it. We could choose a buddy to go in with. My buddy was a guy from Milwaukee. We were pinned down in one area. Someone elsewhere fell injured and I ran to help out, and when I came back my buddy was gone. I couldn’t figure out where he was. I could see all around, but he wasn’t there. And nobody knew where he was.

A few days later someone yelled that they’d found him. They called me over because I was a corpsman. The Japanese had pulled him underground and tortured him. His fingernails... his tongue... It was terrible. I’ve tried hard to forget all this."

Many years later, in researching my father’s life, I asked Cliff Langley, Doc’s co-corpsman, about the discovery of Iggy’s body. Langley told me it looked to him as though Ralph Ignatowski had endured just about every variety of physical cruelty imaginable.

"Both his arms were fractured," Langley said. "They just hung there, there like arms on a broken doll. He had been bayoneted repeatedly. The back of his head had been smashed in."
Other eyewitness reports further indicated that Ignatowski had been tortured in the cave by the Japanese for three days, during which time they also cut out his eyes, cut off his ears, smashed in his teeth, and cut off his genitalia
Posted by Cold Cous Cous
Bucktown, La.
Member since Oct 2003
15344 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 11:30 am to
quote:

They had it coming.

Right, little known fact that 100% of the victims of the atomic bombing were directly involved in the Pearl Harbor planning. *blank stare*

You can think the a-bomb was necessary to end the war while still feeling sympathy for the civilian victims.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62244 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 11:30 am to
quote:

You can think the a-bomb was necessary to end the war while still feeling sympathy for the civilian victims.
:kige:
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 11:32 am to
casualties of war
Posted by vuvuzela
Oregon
Member since Jun 2010
14663 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 11:34 am to
quote:

the a-bomb was necessary


Some have argued that it was not necessary and that Truman had a hard-on to show the world what strength our military had. Some have argued that.
Posted by Cold Cous Cous
Bucktown, La.
Member since Oct 2003
15344 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 11:37 am to
quote:

Some have argued that it was not necessary and that Truman had a hard-on to show the world what strength our military had. Some have argued that.

I've heard this theory, that the real intended message of the a bomb was Stalin. Some people also argue that what finally pushed the Japanese to surrender was when the Russians completely surrounded & massacred the entire Manchurian Army - supposedly Japan's "elite" land unit - in the space of like two weeks. Frankly I have no idea, and I doubt anyone still living knows the real answers.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 11:39 am to
Some believe the world is flat and argue its 6000 years old. Some argue that.
Posted by Col reb 2011
#38
Member since Apr 2013
1614 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 12:00 pm to
I love simple minded people who love conspiracy theories.. The moon landing never happened, Pearl Harbor was planned by our government. I can't wait to see what comes next
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62244 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

I love simple minded people who love conspiracy theories.
vuvuzela?
Posted by vuvuzela
Oregon
Member since Jun 2010
14663 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Some believe the world is flat and argue its 6000 years old. Some argue that.



Concerning the bomb, it's pure speculation, and I wouldn't suggest it to be fact. However, these examples you have listed here are ridiculous in comparison to the reasoning behind dropping the bomb.

There are some eyewitness accounts which speak of Truman being giddy at being able to tell Stalin about the new bomb. In my opinion that is a bit troubling. That again, is my opinion.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 12:23 pm to
Arguing the bomb was not necessary is as asinine as saying the world is 6k years old, sorry. Not denying we wanted to flip off Russia too, but that was ancillary.
Posted by vuvuzela
Oregon
Member since Jun 2010
14663 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Arguing the bomb was not necessary is as asinine as saying the world is 6k years old,


The Japanese were ready to surrender, conditionally, before the bombs were ever dropped. The conditions were merely to save face for the family and to avoid total shame. The country was already in ruins, and they were defeated, and knew they were defeated. It could certainly be argued that had the Ally leadership been merciful they could have saved lives, and ended the war without the dropping of the bombs.

To suggest that the dropping of the bombs somehow made the Japanese realize that they were defeated is much more asinine than the idea that this was purely a flexing of the muscles for the world to see.

Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
133277 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 12:53 pm to
Retaliation is never truly "justified". That's something we tell ourselves at night to help cope with the dead that haunt our dreams.
There is no just war, only a senseless slaughter of boys with more vigor than sense, rushing to fulfill the selfish desires of men with greying hair.

Old men talk about the war. Young men go and die.

Those who speak of payback should hope the price of their own ancestor's atrocities is not visited upon them.

There are no innocents. Men with their blood up are capable of unspeakable horrors when they think no one is looking.
And I speak not to condemn those in that hell of battle, merely to comment on the state of man as it has ever been...capable of selfless mercy, and unenvied cruelty.
This post was edited on 7/18/14 at 12:54 pm
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
88431 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

and cut off his genitalia

and stuffed it in his mouth, that's how he was found
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
21527 posts
Posted on 7/19/14 at 1:44 pm to
vuvuzela, you obviously do not know your history, based on your first sentence alone. If that was the case, why did the Japs not surrender after the first bomb? They were given more than enough time to do so. The problem was that it was the Jap military who was still running the country & they steadfastly refused to surrender. I had 2 uncles who were scheduled to be in the invasion fleet, one being transferred from the European Theater, and our family, multiplied times 100000 other families of soldiers, are extremely, extremely thankful the war was ended the way it did. And as an aside, go ask the families of the soldiers who died in the Baton Death March just how merciful we should have been.Or the families of the 10000's who were raped & beheaded in Nanking. Or the families of the soldiers who died horribly as a result of the criminal medical experiments carried out on them as POW's.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94742 posts
Posted on 7/19/14 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

To suggest that the dropping of the bombs somehow made the Japanese realize that they were defeated is much more asinine than the idea that this was purely a flexing of the muscles for the world to see.


They had a way out - they could have surrendered.

They could have surrendered after Little Boy and spared themselves Fat Man.



Play stupid arse games? Win stupid arse prizes.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
88431 posts
Posted on 7/19/14 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

They had a way out - they could have surrendered.

yep, those assholes weren't giving in even after the 2nd bomb, they finally caved because the Russians wouldn't stop invading/claiming their territory from the other direction, you could say the bomb had some effect in making the Ruskies back off
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram