Started By
Message

re: man dies after NYPD cop puts him in chokehold (for selling untaxed cigarettes)

Posted on 7/23/14 at 2:21 pm to
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28714 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

But not against the law. That's the difference.


This kills me. How is possible that someone as dumb as you has amassed enough wealth to purchase a computer?

Do you think a jury, when they award for the plaintiff, will care about that distinction?

We can debate why the guy died all day long.
Yes, he bears some responsibility for his actions (resisting). The jury will find that NYPD was at fault also, for violating their own internal policies.

NYPD will lose the civil case and the taxpayers will pay millions.

If I'm wrong I will drive to Texas and take BP out to lunch.

Posted by Bleeding purple
Athens, Texas
Member since Sep 2007
25315 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

If I'm wrong I will drive to Texas and take BP out to lunch



we need to go out to lunch anyway you seem like a good guy.





quote:

The jury will find that NYPD was at fault also, for violating their own internal policies. NYPD will lose the civil case and the taxpayers will pay millions.



and this will happen. should not have used choke hold.

should have stepped back and continued to talk him down until they had to deploy tazers (which are allowed) when he continued to resist.


wonder what the OT would have said then

"they didn't have to taze him"
"the law is stupid it was just ciggs"
"but he was black and that white cop tazed him"
"they killed him with the tazer"
"they should have just wrestled him to groud like a man"
"they could have just overpowered with more men and not used tazer"


yadda yadda yadda




This post was edited on 7/23/14 at 2:36 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram