Started By
Message

re: Jimmy might be mad at the organization..

Posted on 7/5/14 at 2:42 pm to
Posted by whodatfan
Member since Mar 2008
21349 posts
Posted on 7/5/14 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

I wouldn't want to trade him at this point anyway. We're going to need him if we want to compete this year. We actually have a healthy Colston, and someone besides Stills to be a threat as a receiver. If we don't have Jimmy, it'll be that much easier for people to defend us. 



This. Have you people forgotten how beast mode this dude is for us?
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30200 posts
Posted on 7/5/14 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

This. Have you people forgotten how beast mode this dude is for us?



And some of you forget before jimmy graham, we were still a potent offense because of the guy under the headset calling these mismatches with a QB that can execute it.

We may not have a perfect mismatch for safeties and linebackers, but Colston in his 'prime' was doing that before Jimmy came along.

This isn't like taking Calvin Johnson away from Stafford and leaving nobody else on the field to throw to. Stills is a solid #2 and could potentially leapfrog to become a #1 WR in our offense. Colston is still solid for 900-1000 yards easily if reports saying "he's as healthy as he's been the last 2 years". Cooks if all direction points correctly could produce somewhere around 800 receiving yards as well.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram