- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Historical stereotypes of F Series - Ram - Silverado/Sierra
Posted on 7/2/14 at 3:04 pm to Austin Cajun
Posted on 7/2/14 at 3:04 pm to Austin Cajun
The new Ram's have rear independent suspension. The ride is quite nice. I still couldn't pull the trigger though. Too much distrust of them still.
That old 318 though. You couldn't kill it.
That old 318 though. You couldn't kill it.
2
Posted on 7/2/14 at 3:05 pm to roadGator
Posted on 7/2/14 at 8:51 pm to roadGator
quote:
Are the new Ram's that bad? I recently test drove a new Ram, a Ford Ecoboost, and a Silverado.
No. People are just ultra brand biased and refuse to believe a company can change. Most people saying Ram's are crap got a bad one back in the 90's or know someone who did. 2009+ Rams are solid.
quote:
The new Ram's have rear coil-sprung live axle suspension.
FIFY. It's a coil-sprung live axle as opposed to leaf springs.
Regarding the OP:
- Ford: seems to be associated with status thanks to the King Ranch. TFM/Rich boy's truck.
- Chevy/GMC: Country boy's truck
- Dodge: Working man's truck
- All of the above: solid overall, but none without faults.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News