Started By
Message

re: What are the boards thoughts on the .357 Sig? Is it superior to the .40 Cal?

Posted on 7/1/14 at 9:23 pm to
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 7/1/14 at 9:23 pm to
That's a good load.

Unfortunately most of the good stuff is watered down. Almost all .357mag, 357sig, and 10mm are powder puff loads. The real shite they were designed for is good stuff. I'm a big time fan of buffalo bore.
This post was edited on 7/1/14 at 9:24 pm
Posted by ctiger69
Member since May 2005
30616 posts
Posted on 7/1/14 at 11:37 pm to
quote:

I'm a big time fan of buffalo bore.



Buffalo bore:

40 s&w = 155 grains, 582 lbs/ft
357 sig= 125 grains, 564 lbs/ft



Those are some hot rounds. I have this for my 40 s&w. If I did not own a 357 mag I would not hesitate to use my 40 s&w for my woods gun.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89745 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 7:34 am to
quote:

Almost all .357mag


Call Cor-bon.

I've told this story before, but we were at the range a few months back with Mrs. Midnight's beast:

STOCK PHOTO



With Corbon 110gr, full power magnums, and 1 lane over from the shop's wall, the owner comes in to pull brass and asks, "What are you shooting there, a .44 magnum?" I said, "No, .357." He says, "Okay."

He comes back about 2 minutes later and says, "I'm sorry, I'm going to have to ask y'all to move down to the end - it's just too loud out in the store."

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram