- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 2/18/19 at 3:10 am to hollywd
quote:
Oh I agree, Question 17 had an issue with it, and 19 & 20 I recall not knowing. or remember reading about. I do not like the way she is wording these questions.
Question numbers don't mean anything since she uses a question bank.
She's also intentionally tricky with the wording of questions because she wants students to "apply" the knowledge. I also do not like it as I am not sure creating your own new terminology for things in an effort to force students to "make the connection" between different wording is necessarily the best way to push the application of knowledge. I always thought that was what the current event assignment was for. This was an issue in her MADM 760 class, but there was a LOT less material to cover compared to 701. The sheer volume of detailed data in 701 greatly increases the difficulty level of the tests and exacerbates this quirk.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News