Started By
Message

re: The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office cancels the Redskins trademark

Posted on 6/18/14 at 9:06 am to
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
77094 posts
Posted on 6/18/14 at 9:06 am to
quote:

prohibits the protection of offensive or disparaging language.



This sounds like a total violation of the 1st amendment to me.
This post was edited on 6/18/14 at 9:06 am
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62057 posts
Posted on 6/18/14 at 9:44 am to
quote:

This sounds like a total violation of the 1st amendment to me.


The government isn't saying you can't use the phrase or call your business Redskins, they're just saying you can't own Redskins as intellectual property and then sue other people that attempt to use the phrase. Actually if anything Trademarks themselves are a violation of free speech because it's the government telling you that you aren't allowed to use a phrase under penalty of law. It's a violation most of us accept and consider a good thing, but philosophically speaking, the government giving one entity a monopoly on a phrase is the antithesis of free speech.
This post was edited on 6/18/14 at 9:45 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram