- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bitcoin faces biggest threat yet: a miner takeover
Posted on 6/17/14 at 5:43 pm to joshnorris14
Posted on 6/17/14 at 5:43 pm to joshnorris14
quote:I doubt the smartest cryptographers in the world are focusing their efforts on Bitcoins, or any other cryptocurrency.
The smartest cryptographers in the world are working on this, do you seriously doubt them?
Please explain to those of us who do not believe the technology will permit people with limited computational power to compete equally with larger operations. Is it more efficient to have 1 internet connection for 100 units of massed computational power, or 100 internet connections for 100 independent units of computational power? Same for the energy costs to operate the computers.
Bitcoin mining is not a cooperative endeavor. It is a competitive endeavor. There are winners and losers. Advances in cryptography will never eliminate the competitive nature of mining. There will still be winners and losers, and economies of scale will play a key role in determining who wins and who loses.
Posted on 6/17/14 at 5:52 pm to Poodlebrain
quote:
I doubt the smartest cryptographers in the world are focusing their efforts on Bitcoins, or any other cryptocurrency.
Unless you consider Ralph Merkle an average cryptographer, you'd be wrong.
quote:
Bitcoin mining is not a cooperative endeavor. It is a competitive endeavor. There are winners and losers. Advances in cryptography will never eliminate the competitive nature of mining. There will still be winners and losers, and economies of scale will play a key role in determining who wins and who loses.
I really wish you would seek to understand instead of seek to dismiss. As I just told you, it's being worked on in a concept Peter Todd describes as "tree chains" where verification of transactions is done by everyone running any kind of node (including SPV clients). This would remove the possibility of a 51% attack while decentralizing the distribution of bitcoin core nodes.
And there are many others working on different problems that will evolve blockchain technology. Greg Maxwell and Adam Back have figured out a way to two-way peg cryptocurrencies which will all but eliminate alt-coins and allow for rapid testing and development in bitcoin. Tree chains gained popularity as a critique over the necessary centralization of bitcoin core nodes that would arise if side chains were implemented into the protocol.
This post was edited on 6/17/14 at 5:54 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News