- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Some ????'s for lefties/greenies/GW supporters
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:56 am to WeeWee
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:56 am to WeeWee
quote:
Why do yall not acknowledge that there are positive outcomes to GW?
I do. So your question is fricking stupid.
quote:
How do you explain that COo2 levels were "safe" during the medieval warm period but the earth was warmer than today? LINK
The Earth wasn't warmer in the medieval warm period than it was today. The paper you cite refers only to Australia and New Zeeland medieval temperatures. Drawing conclusions about the global temperature based solely on records from Australia and New Zeeland is stupid.
The "review paper" you cite was not subject to the peer review process and is self-published by its authors and their donors (Exxon). It has the same value as tobacco company scientists claiming tobacco doesn't cause cancer. In fact, the founder of the source website "Co2Science" - Craig Idso - has co-authored publications with tobacco company shill Fred Singer. The big corporations are actually hiring the same people to promote disinformation in vastly different scientific arenas (climate science vs.human biology) - and you guys are sucking it all up just the same.
quote:
If I am reading this graph right, global temp rose about 1/2 of that was predicted, how do you explain that and doesn't that make you sketical of the politicans solutions? LINK
1/2 of that was predicted over what period using what method?
2
Posted on 6/16/14 at 10:09 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
I do. So your question is fricking stupid.
link to your posts supporting that argument
quote:
he paper you cite refers only to Australia and New Zeeland medieval temperatures. Drawing conclusions about the global temperature based solely on records from Australia and New Zeeland is stupid.
the paper provides evidence challenging the notion that the MWP was only a european or northen hemisphere event.
quote:
The "review paper" you cite was not subject to the peer review process and is self-published by its authors and their donors (Exxon). It has the same value as tobacco company scientists claiming tobacco doesn't cause cancer. In fact, the founder of the source website "Co2Science" - Craig Idso - has co-authored publications with tobacco company shill Fred Singer. The big corporations are actually hiring the same people to promote disinformation in vastly different scientific arenas (climate science vs.human biology) - and you guys are sucking it all up just the same.
when you can't attack the info attack the source.
Posted on 6/16/14 at 12:43 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:
Drawing conclusions about the global temperature based solely on records from Australia and New Zeeland is stupid.
Do you want to go down this road? Really?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News