- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rand Paul to Hillary: Take Your 'Sad Song' to the American People
Posted on 6/10/14 at 1:07 pm to Ace Midnight
Posted on 6/10/14 at 1:07 pm to Ace Midnight
What happened to the Right's mantra of "the least qualified ever to be elected president"? The man just got elected US Senator. At least Obama had been a state senator. Isn't it a bit disingenuous to claim Obama was unqualified but then back Rand? And I don't know if you said this, I'm saying generally.
But I know the answer to my question... What applies to Democrats does not apply to Republicans. Cruz born in another country? No problem. Bush had the NSA spying on us even without any legal authority? He's not president. The Lebanon bombings were 50 times worse in terms of casualties and incompetence (they had barbed wire ammo-less guards) and was covered up AND we invaded fricking Grenada two days later! No problem... Reagan was God.
Yeah I know the rules. Experience will not be an issue. Because he's. republican.
But I know the answer to my question... What applies to Democrats does not apply to Republicans. Cruz born in another country? No problem. Bush had the NSA spying on us even without any legal authority? He's not president. The Lebanon bombings were 50 times worse in terms of casualties and incompetence (they had barbed wire ammo-less guards) and was covered up AND we invaded fricking Grenada two days later! No problem... Reagan was God.
Yeah I know the rules. Experience will not be an issue. Because he's. republican.
5
Posted on 6/10/14 at 1:14 pm to Vegas Bengal
quote:
The man just got elected US Senator
he would have been a US Senator for 6 years before being POTUS.
quote:
At least Obama had been a state senator.
that doesn't qualify you for being POTUS
The biggest problem the next potus will face will be the fallout from the clusterfrick the is the AHA, a person who holds a MD and actually knows what the freak happens in medicine will be better than a freaking lawyer.
quote:
What applies to Democrats does not apply to Republicans
then stop saying they did it too
Posted on 6/10/14 at 1:16 pm to Vegas Bengal
You can't call someone else out for being a "hack" in the other thread and then come in and completely deflect and attempt to change subjects like this in other threads. It's weak.
This post was edited on 6/10/14 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 6/10/14 at 1:19 pm to Vegas Bengal
quote:
What happened to the Right's mantra of "the least qualified ever to be elected president"? The man just got elected US Senator. At least Obama had been a state senator. Isn't it a bit disingenuous to claim Obama was unqualified but then back Rand? And I don't know if you said this, I'm saying generally
First off- he's a Duke-trained physician. Not another lawyer that turned community organizer.
Ooooo- BO was a state senator! Wow. Look how he won that election. Look how he won all of his elections prior to 2008- by totally discrediting and muckracking his opponents.
quote:
What applies to Democrats does not apply to Republicans.
You mean kinda like how Dems constantly complain about Bush even when B.O. does the SAME exact things?
Posted on 6/10/14 at 2:23 pm to Vegas Bengal
quote:
What happened to the Right's mantra of "the least qualified ever to be elected president"?
That precedent has already been established. Try again
Posted on 6/10/14 at 2:42 pm to Vegas Bengal
If you compare professional careers, then Rand Paul is much better than Obama ever was.
Anyways, with the way things are, why would a future vote be hinged on whether someone has a lot of political experience? Seems like to me we have a large amount of problems up there in DC that politicking experience hasn't fixed. Maybe a new dose of real world professional people is what is needed.
But not another "community organizer".
Anyways, with the way things are, why would a future vote be hinged on whether someone has a lot of political experience? Seems like to me we have a large amount of problems up there in DC that politicking experience hasn't fixed. Maybe a new dose of real world professional people is what is needed.
But not another "community organizer".
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News