- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anti- science liberals vs anti-science conservatives: who is more dangerous?
Posted on 6/9/14 at 8:39 pm to C
Posted on 6/9/14 at 8:39 pm to C
The problem is that too science is for sale. Do you the pharmaceutical companies would influence the science related to vaccines? Further, I would imagine the that many scientist are smart enough to know that some findings, should not be shared or it can cost you.
Remember the heat generated by the "The Bell Curve"? I remember very little discussion about the truth of the position offered by the author, but about the racism that such a view represented. This guy caught grief for his science. Do you think that this would have an impact on future scientist and their findings?
Of course science is good, but I do not think that we should believe everything that scientist try to sell us.
Remember the heat generated by the "The Bell Curve"? I remember very little discussion about the truth of the position offered by the author, but about the racism that such a view represented. This guy caught grief for his science. Do you think that this would have an impact on future scientist and their findings?
Of course science is good, but I do not think that we should believe everything that scientist try to sell us.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News