- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: OT Lawyers: Road Home Property
Posted on 5/28/14 at 3:11 pm to LSUFanHouston
Posted on 5/28/14 at 3:11 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
I'm not sure why the Title Company would be in trouble, if there was no public record filed pursuant to the covenant and/or the non completion of the covenant. And why in the world did Party B sign a contract with the sale subject to the covenant.
The covenant is recorded. No lien is filed.
Party B's act of sale stated it was subject to the recorded covenant. Party A stated in the act of sale that it has not violated the covenants.
1
Posted on 5/28/14 at 3:12 pm to Spudly
quote:
Party A stated in the act of sale that it has not violated the covenants.
So, Party A lied. How can party A state it did not violate the covenant when, you know, there is no actual house on the land?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News