Started By
Message

re: who is considered the greatest/biggest movie star of all time?

Posted on 5/28/14 at 8:50 am to
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89777 posts
Posted on 5/28/14 at 8:50 am to
This is tough because of time, modern media saturation, dilution (modern stars simply don't have the cachet of a Cary Grant or Frank Sinatra, for example - and can't achieve it, regardless of what they do).

So - I would argue you need a break line - roughly 1970 - arbitrary, but it gets us there.

Prior to 1970, and limited only to Talkies, you had, at various times, Clark Gable, Cary Grant, Jimmy Stewart, John Wayne, and Bogie - probably nudge out anybody else (Hank Fonda, Gary Cooper, William Powell, might be second tier guys at the cusp).

Bing Crosby, Sinatra and Elvis might need their own category - but all were singers first and movie stars second (honestly - the only newer example I could think of was Cher).

Beginning around 1970 (just a rough break) - you had a "realism" to films and the "stars" since that time have reflected that - very few are "larger than life" stars.

Reynolds

Beatty

Redford

Nicholson

Pacino

Deniro

Ford

Murphy

Stallone

Arnold

Cruise

Depp

Leo

3 guys I would suggest as "transitional" guys who might fit this category are Brando, Newman and Eastwood - big, big stars who had pretty significant work on each side of this line.

There are probably solid arguments for Gable, Grant, Stewart, Bogie, Wayne, Brando, Reynolds, Eastwood and Cruise. I start to see a big separation after this group.

(ETA: And - as for females, there is a clear winner - Marilyn Monroe wins against the field, any way you want to draw it up.)

This post was edited on 5/28/14 at 8:52 am
Posted by DivotBreath
On the course
Member since Oct 2007
3527 posts
Posted on 5/28/14 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

This is tough because of time, modern media saturation, dilution (modern stars simply don't have the cachet of a Cary Grant or Frank Sinatra, for example - and can't achieve it, regardless of what they do).


I agree to the extent that you almost have to break down what constitutes a "movie star" before and after the introduction of internet/social media. Stars from the golden age were really only known outside of Hollywood when fans saw them in a movie, thus, they seemed bigger than life. Stars today are known more for their off-screen antics, politics, talk shows, etc... than they are for their actual work. It's really more of a movie star vs. celebrity comparison when you start trying to consider how actors from different eras rate against each other.
Posted by Mr. Misanthrope
Cloud 8
Member since Nov 2012
5573 posts
Posted on 5/28/14 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

Ace Midnight

Great framework. Good to see Newman mentioned as a "great" bridging the 1970 divide.
Also good to see Ned Beatty mentioned.
Interesting the post 70's not "larger than life" aspect." In a sense prophesied by Hollywood:

Joe Gillis: You're Norma Desmond. You used to be in silent pictures. You used to be big.

Norma Desmond: I am big. It's the pictures that got small.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram