Started By
Message

re: AGW Deniers - Seems Kind of Hopeless

Posted on 5/19/14 at 10:14 am to
Posted by AUbused
Member since Dec 2013
7785 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 10:14 am to
quote:

FALSE.

What if I told you current atmospheric CO2 concentrations are significantly (statistically) below previous levels?


I would tell you that my post didn't address carbon concentration at all and that you should probably re-read it. My post addressed the current natural carbon cycle and its relation to human output.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 10:17 am to
quote:

My post addressed the current natural carbon cycle


exactly, and those carbon cycles were natural too....with statistically higher CO2 concentrations.

Tell me, why is more CO2 bad? What level is "bad"?

Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119380 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 10:20 am to
I guess because CO2 concentrations have increased over the past 17 years and there has been zero positive feedback (stable temperature) CO2 should be re-categorized as a NON-greenhouse gas and considered a NON-pollutant (which it actually is).
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram