Started By
Message

re: The fetish of full employment- Henry Hazlitt vs. Ezra Klein

Posted on 5/19/14 at 5:27 pm to
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 5:27 pm to
I don't understand what point you're trying to make, or even if you have one.

quote:

Ezra Klein recently wrote an article about how joblessness, not inequality, is the great crisis of our time. In typical liberal fashion, he trotted out the good ole' government as a solution to this problem of joblessness- aka public works.

versus
quote:

We can clarify our thinking if we put our chief emphasis where it belongs—on policies that will maximize production.


Public works ARE production.


Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69947 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

Public works ARE production.
Digging ditches and filling them up again is not production. Building unneeded things just to employ people is not production.

And public works require taxation. Every dollar spent on public works is a dollar that cannot be used in the private sector.

And that's exactly what the WPA was. It was makework political shite.

The WPA was NEVER sold as a production project. It was sold as an employment bill.
This post was edited on 5/19/14 at 5:34 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
432317 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

Public works ARE production.

a. not net (whatever money we use to pay for government projects comes out of the private market, either today or tomorrow)

b. his quote spoke of "maximizing" production, which can never be confused with government work
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram