- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: St.George may hold the trump card.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 2:08 pm to Lsut81
Posted on 5/9/14 at 2:08 pm to Lsut81
quote:
Again, any evidence that everything indeed goes into a freeze?
I find it hard to believe; however, if annexation of property could void such a petition drive (and there's plenty of supporting evidence for this), then such a "freeze" would make sense. Otherwise, all an opposing neighboring political subdivision would need to do is convince a property holder to request annexation after the petition was submitted to completely void the effort.
2
Posted on 5/9/14 at 2:10 pm to udtiger
quote:Yep, and the whole process could repeat itself over and over.
all an opposing neighboring political subdivision would need to do is convince a property holder to request annexation after the petition was submitted to completely void the effort.
Posted on 5/9/14 at 2:26 pm to udtiger
quote:But the petition by the Mall, et al, was officially submitted PRIOR to the submission of any signature petition for incorporation by the SG folks.
Otherwise, all an opposing neighboring political subdivision would need to do is convince a property holder to request annexation after the petition was submitted to completely void the effort.
That's a significant distinction from the example you gave.
This post was edited on 5/9/14 at 2:37 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News