Started By
Message

re: Star Wars - A New Hope: How Flawed is it?

Posted on 4/28/14 at 2:01 pm to
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116639 posts
Posted on 4/28/14 at 2:01 pm to
When ESB came out, the opening crawl had it as Episode 5. Star Wars was retconned immediately to the name Star Wars: A New Hope Episode IV, and ROTJ was Episode VI in the original theatrical release.

I mean...come on dude.
This post was edited on 4/28/14 at 2:03 pm
Posted by DanTiger
Somewhere in Luziana
Member since Sep 2004
9480 posts
Posted on 4/28/14 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

When ESB came out, the opening crawl had it as Episode 5. Star Wars was retconned immediately to the name Star Wars: A New Hope Episode IV, and ROTJ was Episode VI in the original theatrical release.

I mean...come on dude.


I'll be damned. I don't ever remember that ever being mentioned when either movie was released. I do, now that you mention it, remember that on the opening crawl but I think most viewers thought it was meant to be some sort of interstellar mumbojumbo that was not meant to be taken literally. I do remember that the commercials advertised it as the follow up and second film, of course that was accurate. You must also remember that we did not have the internet and news was not constantly churning on television so, I imagine, unless you read the trade papers it was unlikely you thought anything about the crawl. Sequals were also a rarity in thsoe days so I don't believe anyone would have ever believed there would be 6 films.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram