Started By
Message

re: BLM vs. Nevada Rancher

Posted on 4/22/14 at 1:35 pm to
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 1:35 pm to
Okay, so that's Nevada and Alabama.

What about all the federal lands in New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, Utah, Arizona, California, Oregon, Washington and Alaska? Are all these lands held illegally? And if so, how could they get away with so much of it for so long without any support from the courts? Has no state brought suit against the feds for lands that they believe are in their purview?



Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
20656 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

You come off as some sort of emotional, irrational woman.


I told you to do the research why Bundy has done what he did, but you fail to do so and told me to go frick myself, now who is acting like an irrational woman?
Posted by S.E.C. Crazy
Alabama
Member since Feb 2013
7905 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 1:43 pm to
No sir, the SCOTUS's rulinb applies to all states.

Once the feds allow statehood, they lose their rights to the land.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram