- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BLM vs. Nevada Rancher
Posted on 4/22/14 at 11:03 am to Lsut81
Posted on 4/22/14 at 11:03 am to Lsut81
quote:
Even if Bundy was 100% in the wrong, there is absolutely no reason to send in 200 armed agents with helicopters and urban assault vehicles in order to remedy the situation.
This is my only disagreement with the thread.
If 5 agents with side arms attempted to force Bundy to acquiesce and were driven off with loss of life, that would be a worse situation than the gov't showing up with 200 agents armed with special weapons forcing Bundy to surrender without a shot or injury to any party.
Otherwise, I'm still thinking the court fricked up and that Bundy may have a legitimate claim of servitude to bring his cattle to water. In that case even one single federal agent showing up at Bundy's door armed with nothing but a notepad and pencil would not be acceptable.
1
Posted on 4/22/14 at 11:06 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
This is my only disagreement with the thread.
I apologize if I came off confrontational
My point is that I don't think the Govt should use force like that for non-violent offenders. If he had killed multiple people and was likely to do it again, ok, you go in with force.
But for a non-violent crime, you pick his arse up at the local store when he is alone or you seize his financial assets.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News