- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BLM vs. Nevada Rancher
Posted on 4/22/14 at 10:08 am to Lsut81
Posted on 4/22/14 at 10:08 am to Lsut81
quote:
ho was accepting payments, what was supposed to be done, what wasn't done
Exactly. If you are equating the Federal government with a private citizen. Then the following holds true.
Private citizen (Bundy) enters into agreement with another private citizen (government) to perform services at an agreed upon rate. Private citizen (Government) refuses to live up to the agreement by refusal of services and mismanagement of assets. Under a private contract, private citizen (government) has breached said contract and deemed the contract null and void.
End of story.
This post was edited on 4/22/14 at 10:09 am
Posted on 4/22/14 at 10:25 am to DR Hops
quote:
Private citizen (Bundy) enters into agreement with another private citizen (government) to perform services at an agreed upon rate.
I don't think that's the issue in Bundy's eyes. I believe he believes he has a servitude across public land in perpetuity.
If I have a servitude across my neighbor's property, and he locks me out, I'll call the sheriff and re-gain access across his property.
BUT - I have to prove I have that servitude. Apparently the court found Bundy's proof of any right of servitude lacking and judged against him accordingly.
I think it's more complicated than Bundy simply renting public lands for grazing his cattle.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News