quote:
exactly. basically they want their pet chinese solar farm political project (harry reid's son) and are using the land bundy's cattle was grazing on as the offset.

end result = more 'untouchable' land in nevada in fed control.

pretty soon there wont be land left anywhere in the country that isn't controlled by the government.

I don't understand what you want though; I just think you aren't thinking your position all the way through.

Are you against all development of federal land, or just projects you don't like?

To be more specific:
If BLM decided to open up a few thousand acres to oil and gas drilling, and in order to offset the environmental damage from the drilling the oil companies wanted to pay to improve the environment on some other federal lands, and the mitigation project (and the drilling) couldn't move forward until some trespassing cows were removed from the property, would you support armed resistance to removing the cows from the property?

This post was edited on 4/17/14 at 10:20 am

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by CAD703X

Liberty Island

Member since Jul 2008

78781 posts

Posted on 4/17/14 at 10:24 am to deSandman

quote:
If BLM decided to open up a few thousand acres to oil and gas drilling, and in order to offset the environmental damage from the drilling the oil companies wanted to pay to improve the environment on some other federal lands, and the mitigation project (and the drilling) couldn't move forward until some trespassing cows were removed from the property, would you support armed resistance to removing the cows from the property?

so because fatcat congressman reid is lining his pockets (or his son's pockets) by calling in the federal markers on lands used by cattlemen for over a century its ok to you?

the beneficary here is CHINA (and the politicians who take the money)

the losers are the american ranchers who sold their farms and have to find a new way to support their family because they were 'shortsighted' and thought the land they had use of for the prior 100 years and was needed for them to remain solvent would always be there.

yeah, you can blame the rancher for believing they could use this land in perpetuity but when you look at how they were railroaded by a bunch of enviroWACKO lobbyists and a corrupt politican to support a FOREIGN NATION coming in and basically usurping these rights..it kinda smells.

This post was edited on 4/17/14 at 10:26 am

3 ...

Report Post

O-T Lounge - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board