- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 3/19/14 at 8:52 pm to Scruffy
If you take a second to think about it, Holder likely made the suit for political reasons. If the court rules with them they get two wins, the court ruling and an opportunity to pander to Latinos. If the court ruled against them (as they did here) they still got the opportunity to pander.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 8:54 pm to Scruffy
Wait a second. How was this NOT governed by the Arizona case?
I need to find this ruling.
I need to find this ruling.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 10:02 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Seems like common sense to me.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News