- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So Cosmos is more atheistic rant than actual cosmos?
Posted on 3/17/14 at 10:46 am to Salmon
Posted on 3/17/14 at 10:46 am to Salmon
quote:
I found the eye segment quite interesting and entertaining...
So did I.
But he led with "Some people think the human eye couldn't have...." That's what this thread is about.
It's a decent show. Could be better. Worst part about it is that they've purposefully used it as a means of engaging creationists and evolution-deniers in debate. So far, it's felt less like science and more like a one-sided argument.
Creationism isn't science. Those who discredit the findings and conclusions of science shouldn't even be included or mentioned in a science show.
2
Posted on 3/17/14 at 10:49 am to StringedInstruments
quote:
But he led with "Some people think the human eye couldn't have...." That's what this thread is about.
I like that the show is aware of certain arguments and seems more casual with it's narration
I like that it doesn't feel like a stagnant science documentary
Posted on 3/17/14 at 10:50 am to StringedInstruments
quote:
Creationism isn't science. Those who discredit the findings and conclusions of science shouldn't even be included or mentioned in a science show
These same people are politically powerful and very adept at getting real science banned in schools.
This show should mention them and how they are wrong
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News