Started By
Message

re: Vanderbilt pitcher windup question.

Posted on 3/15/14 at 4:54 pm to
Posted by LSUTigers1986
Member since Mar 2014
1336 posts
Posted on 3/15/14 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

Wrong, it's not a balk because nobody is on base.

What would suddenly make it a balk if he pitched like that from the wind up with a runner on base?
This post was edited on 3/15/14 at 8:16 pm
Posted by Thorny
Montgomery, AL
Member since May 2008
1920 posts
Posted on 3/15/14 at 7:52 pm to
Unless the NCAA rules are significantly different from MLB rules, a balk cannot be called with bases empty:
quote:

Rule 8.01(b) Comment: With no runners on base, the pitcher is not required to come to a complete stop when using the Set Position. If, however, in the umpire?s judgment, a pitcher delivers the ball in a deliberate effort to catch the batter off guard, this delivery shall be deemed a quick pitch, for which the penalty is a ball. See Rule 8.05(e) Comment.

quote:

Rule 8.05(e) Comment: A quick pitch is an illegal pitch. Umpires will judge a quick pitch as one delivered before the batter is reasonably set in the batter?s box. With runners on base the penalty is a balk; with no runners on base, it is a ball. The quick pitch is dangerous and should not be permitted.

MLB Pitching rules
It was weird, but legal, as long as it was with bases empty and was not a quick pitch.

GEAUX TIGERS
Posted by GarmischTiger
Humboldt County
Member since Mar 2007
6622 posts
Posted on 3/16/14 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

What would suddenly make it a balk if he pitched like that from the wind up with a runner on base?
He wouldn't (or more accurately, shouldn't) pitch from the wind up with a runner on base, so it's really not an issue.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram