re: How to respond to Insufficient Debt Validation?

quote:

---

Your honor attached is an affidavit of the dept of motor vehicles attesting Legal Tiger is the registered owner of the vehicle in question.
City ordinance blah blah says the owner of the vehicle is liable for this infraction.

City asks for judgment as prayed for.

---

Judgment against a vehicle? I'm being serious.

As stated earlier, this is all rhetorical because the whole can of worms that is the for-profit law enforcement enterprise will be open to discovery, which your bosses that are behind the local Redflex money grab do not want out in the open. That's why Joey D and Tony T haven't been successful to date with this current council in authorizing collection suits, but I digress.

So, you haul me into court, without any proof that I was ever provided notice that I was issued a "ticket" by your company or any proof as to who the actual driver of the vehicle upon which you are attempting to impose liability. I stipulate that I am the registered owner of the vehicle...all you might have at that point is that the original fine will be judicially recognized to be owed by me. I then agree to pay $25.00, which Redflex gets to keep half, the lawyer gets a whopping 1/3 ($8.21, ftr) and the poor city/parish government will then keep what's left.

Tell me again about how this is not about money, but public safety?

Full disclosure: I have zero unpaid Redflex money grab "tickets" nor have I ever received one.