Started By
Message

re: General NBA Links

Posted on 3/15/14 at 5:26 pm to
Posted by 42
Member since Apr 2012
3703 posts
Posted on 3/15/14 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

After watching enough games and seeing the numbers, I lean towards 3. 


I'll do you one better: I says it's about dictating defensive spacing by having enough credible threats on the floor at once. They are forcing their way to rim, but the defenses can more easily stop them (as you said) but are more about to stop the Pelicans because they do not have to be as close to Aminu (example) because he is not a good shooter and the team (now) lacks multiple mature passer to get thr ball to the weak side.

A fine analysis by you, and a good article. I just think being a threat from anywhere is a good thing, and this point has, for some reason, been disputed.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 3/16/14 at 8:58 am to
quote:

it's about dictating defensive spacing by having enough credible threats on the floor at once


That is certainly an issue. Sometimes you have to play two non Davis bigs with Aminu and Evans. That should be avoided if possible, but you get the hand you're dealt.

But I also see systemic space issues. I am flabbergasted each time Davis (or Gordon or Evans) gets an ISO and we see two or three Pelicans crash into the lane before he makes a move. Or how 3PA are basically reliant on Anderson's unique talent and not part of the overall design.

I now believe that a large part of the high ORating this season was based on OREB and a very low TO rate. It worked well for a while. But that was with better personnel for defenses to worry about. Adaption is not a Monty strength.

Even with the injuries and the poor talent, there are still guys who can stretch the defense with shooting. Gordon, Morrow, Roberts, Babbitt, Miller, Rivers. Even Ajinca seems to have a decent jumper. If teams want to sag, let these guys shoot. But force teams to make a choice of helping or staying. Make them worry or hesitate with those threats.

quote:

I just think being a threat from anywhere is a good thing, and this point has, for some reason, been disputed.



I agree. Ideally you work to get certain shots (corner 3s, RA, etc) but you need to be able to hurt a defense when they work to take those away.

What bugs me is the poor spacing (:deadhorse:) and how the offense, in general, seems to settle for the available shot, not work to find the best one.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram