Started By
Message

re: Question about Stars with regards to rankings.

Posted on 3/4/14 at 9:24 pm to
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
33330 posts
Posted on 3/4/14 at 9:24 pm to
Rivals has always said what they base it on. I think most of the other sites are similar.

quote:

The ranking system ranks prospects on a numerical scale from 6.1-4.9.

6.1 Franchise Player; considered one of the elite prospects in the country, generally among the nation's top 25 players overall; deemed to have excellent pro potential; high-major prospect

6.0-5.8 All-American Candidate; high-major prospect; considered one of the nation's top 300 prospects; deemed to have pro potential and ability to make an impact on college team

5.7-5.5 All-Region Selection; considered among the region's top prospects and among the top 750 or so prospects in the country; high-to-mid-major prospect; deemed to have pro potential and ability to make an impact on college team

5.4-5.0 Division I prospect; considered a mid-major prospect; deemed to have limited pro potential but definite Division I prospect; may be more of a role player

4.9 Sleeper; no Rivals.com expert knew much, if anything, about this player; a prospect that only a college coach really knew about

Posted by Purple Lion
Member since Feb 2013
636 posts
Posted on 3/5/14 at 9:37 am to
So each of those categories corresponds to a star ranking for rivals, 6.1 being the 5-star?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram