- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Arizona religious bill that angered gays vetoed
Posted on 2/27/14 at 1:51 am to weedGOKU666
Posted on 2/27/14 at 1:51 am to weedGOKU666
quote:
So I take it you would still support the bill if the discrimination happened to be racially or gender slanted?
Of course, the individual that was rejected can use the free market composed of that business's peers to let everybody know that business is bigoted as frick and not to give them their money.
This happened in liberal land Oregon and a town there used the free market and cut off the business to customers and profits through peaceful means and not using gov't force. It's impossible for a business to have any recourse against the free market without the force of the state.
There should be no protected class laws forced on the private sector at all. It should only apply to the public sector in activities, buildings and professions that are publicly funded.
Bottom line here, to deny people property rights means to turn people into property owned by the state.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 2:30 am to Sentrius
quote:
Of course, the individual that was rejected can use the free market composed of that business's peers to let everybody know that business is bigoted as frick and not to give them their money.
This happened in liberal land Oregon and a town there used the free market and cut off the business to customers and profits through peaceful means and not using gov't force. It's impossible for a business to have any recourse against the free market without the force of the state.
There should be no protected class laws forced on the private sector at all. It should only apply to the public sector in activities, buildings and professions that are publicly funded.
Bottom line here, to deny people property rights means to turn people into property owned by the state.
So if you are gay, don't live in small social conservative town, USA. In many small towns, their isn't much of free market.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News