- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anti-First Amendment Rights LGBT activist decry Kansas new law
Posted on 2/14/14 at 11:45 am to los angeles tiger
Posted on 2/14/14 at 11:45 am to los angeles tiger
I am not sure about all this but the way I read it that any kind of business cannot discriminate according to sexual preference or wedding.
I guess all this is doing is putting sexual orientation in a class with no discrimination by race or religion. or am I reading all this wrong?
or is the issue that some want to retain the right to discriminate? I guess if tou are a business serving the public who can't discriminant. Look at a bakery case in Iowas months ago.
or am I missing something?
I guess all this is doing is putting sexual orientation in a class with no discrimination by race or religion. or am I reading all this wrong?
or is the issue that some want to retain the right to discriminate? I guess if tou are a business serving the public who can't discriminant. Look at a bakery case in Iowas months ago.
or am I missing something?
This post was edited on 2/14/14 at 11:47 am
Posted on 2/14/14 at 11:48 am to JEAUXBLEAUX
This seems to directed to cases like the Iowa and Colorado cake/wedding hall cases.
Posted on 2/14/14 at 11:51 am to JEAUXBLEAUX
Where in the constitution does it say "if you run your private business, you forfeit your first amendment rights to the dictates of the state"?
Where in the constitution does it say you cannot discriminate? If it is "wrong to discriminate" then it means you shouldn't vote. Voting is in itself discrimination. If you think discrimination is wrong then you should stop voting, Jeaux.
Where in the constitution does it say you cannot discriminate? If it is "wrong to discriminate" then it means you shouldn't vote. Voting is in itself discrimination. If you think discrimination is wrong then you should stop voting, Jeaux.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)