Started By
Message

re: Anti-First Amendment Rights LGBT activist decry Kansas new law

Posted on 2/14/14 at 11:45 am to
Posted by JEAUXBLEAUX
Bayonne, NJ
Member since May 2006
55358 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 11:45 am to
I am not sure about all this but the way I read it that any kind of business cannot discriminate according to sexual preference or wedding.

I guess all this is doing is putting sexual orientation in a class with no discrimination by race or religion. or am I reading all this wrong?

or is the issue that some want to retain the right to discriminate? I guess if tou are a business serving the public who can't discriminant. Look at a bakery case in Iowas months ago.

or am I missing something?
This post was edited on 2/14/14 at 11:47 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99788 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 11:48 am to
This seems to directed to cases like the Iowa and Colorado cake/wedding hall cases.
Posted by los angeles tiger
1,601 miles from Tiger Stadium
Member since Oct 2003
55976 posts
Posted on 2/14/14 at 11:51 am to
Where in the constitution does it say "if you run your private business, you forfeit your first amendment rights to the dictates of the state"?

Where in the constitution does it say you cannot discriminate? If it is "wrong to discriminate" then it means you shouldn't vote. Voting is in itself discrimination. If you think discrimination is wrong then you should stop voting, Jeaux.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram