- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Settle a drunken argument: Tyson vs Bruce Lee no holds barred KO match
Posted on 2/14/14 at 6:08 am to Maximus
Posted on 2/14/14 at 6:08 am to Maximus
quote:
Bruce Lee was like 115lbs.
145 pounds, but he hit like he weighed 200 pounds.
I don't think Tyson is getting enough credit as a street fighter in the thread - he peaked fairly early, physically, which means taking him, you either have to take the fastest, hardest hitting, but dumbest Tyson, or a slightly more experienced, but slower Tyson.
Taking a 28-year old Bruce Lee is the smart play here - he was a brutally well trained and well conditioned athlete - and a genius at unarmed combat.
I say Lee, although it would be a mistake for an opponent to underestimate Mike Tyson at, say, 22, in a fight like this.
This post was edited on 2/14/14 at 6:09 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News