re: The decline is not real

So you wanted to sling the ball around in the bowl game with an untried QB when we had an NFL first rounder at tailback? Ground and pound was the wisest gameplan. We didn't have to put it on Jennings' shoulders, so we didn't. It wasn't flashy, but the game was never in doubt.

quote:

---

Anyone that knows football can see that starting with Florida the offense started to revert back to more of a ground and pound attack when there was no need to because it was fine.

---

God, how can someone be this narrow-minded? You know that teams typically adjust game plans based on the team they're playing right? Hey, we threw it 32453459 times against UGA and it worked so it must work against Florida, amirite!?

Even so, let's just ignore the fact that the games following Florida, Mett threw the ball 33 times (and lost), 24, 23, 20 and 22 times, respectively. I wish we would have gone to more "ground and pound" against Ole Miss, maybe we could have won.

quote:

---

You can't tell me Miles didn't suggest it, but you will.

---

I'm sure he did suggest running more against the more stout defenses we were facing because he's... you know... not a dipshit like you.

quote:

---

Or the bowl game when Jennings started running the regular option that never worked with Jefferson. Where did that come from??

---

It came from us tailoring a game plan for a more mobile QB. The option a few times a game isn't inherently a bad thing, and people that think this are small-minded idiots.

quote:

---

I guess Cameron couldn't wait to use that play.

---

I'm glad he didn't and I hope we run occaisonal option with either Jennings or Harris to keep the opposing defenses honest.

We scored a touchdown on an option play against Iowa FWIW