Started By
Message

re: Why Do People Here Think Cecil Collins [Was] Better Than Jeremy Hill?

Posted on 1/11/14 at 5:59 pm to
Posted by drexyl
Mingovia
Member since Sep 2005
23086 posts
Posted on 1/11/14 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

He only played 3 games
this is why his legend has grown to the ridiculous level it is today. he was a great back but there are a many who will never admit there is or was a better back than cecil Collins. he had 3 games and dominated all three.

Sometimes all you have to do is do something a few times well in front of a large audience and never do it again.



Faulk was better.
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
14023 posts
Posted on 1/11/14 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

Faulk was better.


Not in that 3 game stretch.
Posted by loopdog
Alexandria, La.
Member since Nov 2011
467 posts
Posted on 1/11/14 at 10:28 pm to
Billy Cannon would have hurt both Hill and Collins. If you don't believe me next time Cannon is at a game walk up next to him. Even at 70-whatever- he is an imposing figure. He was the original beast ! And he was faster than both of them !
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram