Started By
Message

re: Best Way to age a buck in the field?

Posted on 12/26/13 at 8:37 pm to
Posted by bushwacker
youngsville
Member since Feb 2010
3707 posts
Posted on 12/26/13 at 8:37 pm to
Google jawbone aging. Studies show they are not accurate. Only about 50-60% if i remember correctly.

Only proven method is to ask the deer
Posted by LoneStarTiger
Lone Star State
Member since Aug 2004
16028 posts
Posted on 12/26/13 at 8:58 pm to
Jawbones are very accurate, up to a point (3.5). But after that there can be some variance in wear

Most biologists that look at hundreds every year get pretty good at it.
Posted by jeffereycole
Gallup, New Mexico
Member since May 2012
142 posts
Posted on 12/26/13 at 9:38 pm to
I am a biologist and have aged on average 50 deer per year for 24 years. The best method requires killing the deer and pulling incisors, cross sectioning and aging like tree rings. Second best is looking at the lower jaw, which I think I can be within 1 year at over 90% of the time with my experience and the feedback I have received after the incisors, double checked my estimations. But I am not comfortable aging by looking at antlers because genetics and climate factors are too big of factors to just throw into the equation when trying to decide if a buck is a cull. We don't do that because we know a hunter cannot be held accountable for that.
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
35859 posts
Posted on 12/26/13 at 11:57 pm to
quote:

Only proven method is to ask the deer
This post was edited on 12/26/13 at 11:58 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram