- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Battlefield 4 vs COD Ghosts
Posted on 12/22/13 at 8:51 am to The Eric
Posted on 12/22/13 at 8:51 am to The Eric
In the end, all these opinions are just opinions.
These two games can easily separate two different kinds of play styles that people want to take part in.
COD=completely fast-paced quick-twitching type of shooter. Not aspect of vehicles, but you have to play to the killstreak factors.
BF4=a little slower unless playing in the close quarter buildings. More aspects to the game when you include the vehicles, cause if you have a team with a good jet pilot or group of tank guys, they can totally run that game easily.
I haven't really run into camping snipers too too much in BF4, which we all know is what COD players made the biggest stink about in BF games. But I imagine they stick mostly to the conquest games, I've been playing 100% rush and if you go into the mountains to snipe you easily get left behind by your team once they move up to the next base. BF4 levels are too massive and long range shots are getting harder and harder cause to make even a decent shot your probably rolling with a 20x hunter scope and having to lead way too much. BF4 is playing out of the snipers hands I feel by making the maps too large, which is normally the opposite, but with players being way to spastic while they are moving, the only potential targets long range camping snipers have are other camping long range snipers, which can only normally lead to 1-4 kills per game in rush.
These two games can easily separate two different kinds of play styles that people want to take part in.
COD=completely fast-paced quick-twitching type of shooter. Not aspect of vehicles, but you have to play to the killstreak factors.
BF4=a little slower unless playing in the close quarter buildings. More aspects to the game when you include the vehicles, cause if you have a team with a good jet pilot or group of tank guys, they can totally run that game easily.
I haven't really run into camping snipers too too much in BF4, which we all know is what COD players made the biggest stink about in BF games. But I imagine they stick mostly to the conquest games, I've been playing 100% rush and if you go into the mountains to snipe you easily get left behind by your team once they move up to the next base. BF4 levels are too massive and long range shots are getting harder and harder cause to make even a decent shot your probably rolling with a 20x hunter scope and having to lead way too much. BF4 is playing out of the snipers hands I feel by making the maps too large, which is normally the opposite, but with players being way to spastic while they are moving, the only potential targets long range camping snipers have are other camping long range snipers, which can only normally lead to 1-4 kills per game in rush.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News