- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why would Clemson (10-2) get at-large over Baylor (11-1)?
Posted on 12/3/13 at 3:51 pm to TigerintheNO
Posted on 12/3/13 at 3:51 pm to TigerintheNO
Does the comittee put all the teams in every bowl, or just the top four?
I haven't even thought about that.
I haven't even thought about that.
Posted on 12/3/13 at 4:42 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Does the comittee put all the teams in every bowl, or just the top four?
I haven't even thought about that.
I'm it's just the top 4 with one more spot available for the "BCS bowls" for a qualifying team not in the 6 major conferences.
Aside from that, I think it's more like it used to be with the bowls picking the matchups they want (largely based on conference tie-ins).
Like the playoff or not, the one thing that has seemed likely from the people like Mandel at SI.com that have been doing "what if" scenarios is that there may be less crappy matchups that there have been with the BCS.
Posted on 12/3/13 at 5:39 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Does the comittee put all the teams in every bowl, or just the top four?
I haven't even thought about that.
The top three are guaranteed one (the "98 Kansas State" rule).
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)