Started By
Message

re: Ingram's best game, to be sure, BUT...

Posted on 11/11/13 at 10:29 pm to
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 11/11/13 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

Funny, because your OP wasn't about his production. It was so you could bitch about how he doesn't look like a running back should look in your oh so experienced eye.

You're just typing now to hear the keyboard click. It's YOU who brought up the topic of "what matters", so I responded. MY topic was to ask if you were impressed.
quote:

I did notice that you didn't dispute my point about being a miserable schmuck. It is therefore deemed admitted.

If I took the time to dispute every lie and insult hurled my way there'd be little time for anything else. Your "deemed" on that score is about as wise as your "deemed" that Mark Ingram's one performance against a shitty defense is "all that matters"... i.e., not very.

Posted by Ice Cold
Over Macho Grande
Member since Jun 2004
18741 posts
Posted on 11/12/13 at 8:15 am to
quote:

It's YOU who brought up the topic of "what matters"
You're absolutely right. I brought it up because production >>> "how he looked," which is your premise. To answer your original question, I was impressed with his production. You apparently were not impressed with "what you saw." Which absolutely no one cares about but you.
quote:

If I took the time to dispute every lie and insult hurled my way there'd be little time for anything else. Your "deemed" on that score is about as wise as your "deemed" that Mark Ingram's one performance against a shitty defense is "all that matters"... i.e., not very.
You should at least own your misery and not blame others for stating the obvious.
This post was edited on 11/12/13 at 8:18 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram