- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Reproductive Rights Discussion - Men get a raw deal
Posted on 11/8/13 at 12:31 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
Posted on 11/8/13 at 12:31 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
Now, She has a "tissue mass" in her.
BHP - I know you don't want to go down this path, but combining the above, and
quote:
So, UNTIL the child is born
might lead one to conclude you have defined the problem away, in order to justify a particular practice.
In your mind, does the "tissue mass" have any rights, whatsoever, until it breathes room air? And, if so, what is so magical about that act?
(If I misinterpreted your position, I apologize.)
2
Posted on 11/8/13 at 12:42 pm to Ace Midnight
FWIW My take: Mothers have a responsibility to the baby upon conception. Fathers have a responsibility to the mothers upon conception. Both have a responsibility to the child after birth. Parents have a responsibility to each other.
This post was edited on 11/8/13 at 12:43 pm
Posted on 11/8/13 at 12:54 pm to Ace Midnight
I worded it very specifically. This thread is about legal issues not moral. So I addressed it on those grounds. Legally, it is only a "child" after it is born. Thus, there is no contridiction. It is a mass in utero. It is a child after born..
The issue of the thread relates to that
The issue of the thread relates to that
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News