- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Zeiss Conquest 3x9x40 vs Leupold VX-II 3x9x50
Posted on 10/27/13 at 5:31 pm to Ice Cream Sammich
Posted on 10/27/13 at 5:31 pm to Ice Cream Sammich
quote:
I mean yeah, what you mentioned was great, but why not save some money and get the same quality
Not true. Nikon is not on par. Its not bad, but its not a zeiss. That being said, I'd spend a little more money and buy the 1" Swarovski.
1
Posted on 10/27/13 at 6:10 pm to HebertFest08
Was directed more towards Leupold than zeiss. But the upper level monarchs are still better than the bottom conquest models. Not a fair comparison but truth.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News